Saturday, February 16, 2008

Samsung SGH-M110 Solid - Mobile Phone Review

Similar Products Owned

Nokia 5.1
Nokia 3210
Nokia 5110
Nokia 8210
Sony Ericsson T68i
Sony Ericsson P900
O2 XDA
Sony Ericsson T610i
Motorolla
Nokia 8910
Nokia 8910i

Reason For Purchase

I have had enough of mobile phones, mobile phone shop staff and mobile phone users. Here’s why:
Mobile Phones: I have only found one handset that does exactly what I want with no waste and that is no longer made. The second hand 8910/is I have bought on eBay have never lasted.

Mobile Phone Shop Staff: They only really want to sell you the latest handset with the latest tariff, without really understanding how they work, or being able to sell you only what you need. My last attempt to patronise a local shop ended with me explaining to the staff member why he couldn’t listen to the music library he had paid for on anything other than his expensive handset.

Mobile Phone Users: Why buy a smart phone if you aren’t smart enough to use the technology. (Probably because you were sold to by the sales person above.)

My idea handset would have:

LCD Screen Visible in daylight! (Mono is fine)
Bluetooth Connects to real cameras for handling photographs, laptops & PDAs for internet access on screens that you can see.
2 Bluetooth Nodes Like the Sony Ericsson T610i this would enable pairing with two devices at once enabling, for instance, remote dialling from your PDA whilst connected to a Bluetooth headset.
No camera To make it pocket sized
Size Jeans pocket
Shock proof Because it’s going to get dropped
Battery life Plenty

The Samsung Solid had many of these features, so I bought one.
See the almost there specification here.

The
O2 Online Shop seemed the best place to buy because they had them in stock and my business SIM card is O2. Sadly it is impossible to extract a handset from the business shop and as I later discovered to get a VAT receipt for your purchase without about an hour on the phone.

First Impressions

No real problems on taking the handset out of the box – it was all as advertised. The phone appears to be reasonably dust proof and despite being quite lightweight it doesn’t seem cheap or fragile. I would hope that the lightweight construction (with no unnecessary features) lessens the effect of being dropped.

Sadly setting up is a hassle as, like most models, it is impossible to move your address book between handsets. The only option appears to be to move from one handset to the SIM card which cannot hold a record linking three or more numbers (mobile home & work etc.) 2 hours work later your phone book is ready to use. (And I only have 50 records!)

Then came an interesting revelation. Having carefully read the instructions for setup (both in the manual provided and that downloaded from the Samsung web site) it became apparent that the speed dial function was missing from the phone. Contacting Samsung only resulted in the buck passing to O2 – “Their fault.” said Samsung. A call to O2, giving them a chance to deny it and quote from the manual, find a Solid Handset, find a SIM card, find a charger to charge the flat battery, wait because you can’t use the handset until the battery has a little charge, reveals that “It’s not on this phone either!”. The answer: “It must be something that Samsung have removed.” Luckily with that base covered I offered them the Samsung technical support number to check for themselves at which point they acknowledged that maybe it was down to them. “Yes we’ve removed it.” was the final confession but they were unable to explain why. Beware.

From a week of use the handset seems fine, although I can’t say I have dropped it on purpose or accidentally. The torch has been useful a couple of times. Even so another problem has raised its head (apart from an hour on the phone to get a VAT receipt). On about 20% of calls I found that either I could hear but the other party couldn’t hear me or the call went through but neither party could hear the other. This was the case whether I made or received the call. After about three days of this I decided to investigate the O2 returns process. Deep joy!. 24 minutes on a premium rate phone line (which because O2 have changed their charging structure 12 months into my contract now costs me money) reveals that because with no other option I had to buy a PAYG handset, the process is that I have to return the faulty one for a refund and the buy another. I love the way that so many large companies, rather than thinking how can we make life easier for our customers in the event of a problem, invent processes that could not be more complex. A couple of tips from this exercise:
Remember to ask what the Freepost address is – it won’t be volunteered as their recommendation will be to send it recorded delivery.
Ask about how to claim back the cost of the 25 minute premium rate phone call and if you find out let me know.

So I have ordered a fresh phone online and will be returning the broken one in the original packaging that I had the foresight to retain. More to follow.

Summary

Happy so far with the build and functionality. However:

Speed Dial has been removed by O2
A fault developed after just over a week of use which meant callers could not hear me and sometimes we couldn't hear each other.
The O2 returns procedure is costly and convoluted, wit no provision to recoup the costs involved.

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

History

The Ministry of Crap Design is an idea that I had whilst whiling away a flight to South Africa in 2001, and was really because of my experiences in toilets, hence the name. It started in a notebook that a design agency I once employed gave to me as a gift - a suitable use for it I now think. It has developed into this web log and may one day go back onto paper, who knows. In short, it is a cry to those that are paid to design, to whatever level, to just pause to think for a moment.

My uncle always said that you could judge a restaurant on the way that the butter was served. If it arrived in a small pot fresh from the fridge, all was probably well in the kitchens. If it came in a foil packet, you deserved what you got. I developed my own theory; that if the toilets are clean, stylish and all in all a pleasure to use, then the kitchens are probably in a good state. (I always enjoyed the facilities at Harrods, even though on my last visit I spent a pound - pun intended.) Poor toilets….

Anyway, on the way to South Africa I discovered that not all toilets are created equal and this brought into focus things that I had noticed in over 30 years of toilet patronage, but not really given much thought to. Sadly the same must be said for those responsible. Some people who create a toilet do so in the knowledge that they will never have to suffer the results of their handiwork. There are many examples here.

I then decided that toilets are not the only examples of poor design that are forced upon us. The suffering reaches every area of our lives, in ways so blindingly obvious to my layman’s eyes that I can hold back no longer. And so I created this cry to the designers of the world. I am not a professional designer, and my intention is not to be negative about anyone’s product, service or business. I am enough of a realist to understand that everything is created to a budget, but surely many of the things that I have observed don’t actually cost money to get right. It is meant to help, not hinder, so don’t sue me for commenting on your product or service – far better to post a comment and let us know the reality. Bear that in mind if you choose to comment as a layman. My friends involved in the business of design have explained many times why things are the way they are. But sometimes the answer can be as simple as making a toilet door turn outwards rather than inwards, which ends this introduction where it started.

The Legal Stuff

The Legal Stuff Will Go Here.

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Casio G-Shock Watch (AWG-101-1AER)

Similar Products Owned

  • Timex Boys Analogue
  • Casio LCD Digital
  • Tissot Self Winding Analogue
  • Puslar Analogue
  • Swatch (Black)
  • Accurist Analogue
  • Rolex Submariner (Hong Kong Fake, Seiko movement apparently)
  • Casio Digital (Various)
  • Tag Heur 1500
Reason For Purchase

In 1994 I bought a Tag Heur 1500 series watch, after a Royal Marine colleague explain why he had bought one and how pleased he was with it. As he had been through SAS selection I reckoned that he probably expected more from a watch than I ever would, so I parted with £450 cash. For about 10 years it has been outstanding, consistently gaining only a second a week, until it needed servicing about three years ago and has not been right since. This year I finally tired of it needing a service every 12 months and being away for 2 months, paying £125 - £140 for the privilege. I also lost patience when the strap needed repairing or replacing, but that is another story.

I bought a Seiko watch for my wife some time ago for around £100 and this has kept perfect time, whereas my Tag has started to lose anything from a few seconds to a few hours a day. I did some Googling to see what I could expect as far as accuracy was concerned, having heard from my brother that his Rolex dealer suggested that he should be happy with his Submariner being only accurate to +/- 10 seconds a day. This was because it was a precision instrument! I learnt a great deal from the Time Zone web site and have decided that I have been had. My new definition of a good watch is one that just works. Prestige brands simply mean that you can afford the problems they bring with them. Hardly a cachet worth paying for.

More Googling resulted in me considering two models; a Seiko Kinetic Diver’s Watch and a Casio Radio Controlled Solar G-Shock. They both met my requirements which were:


  • Accurate
  • Require Minimal Maintenance
  • Robust
  • Analogue
  • Waterproof (Various water sports, snorkelling being the deepest)
  • Fit under a suit shirt (double) cuff
  • Visible at night
  • Subtle
I found that H Samuels had the two models I wanted so I tried them on there, to find that as I suspected, the Seiko would not fit under my cuff (and was also a little bling for my liking) so the Casio won. I bought it for £99.99, encouraged by the sales assistant telling me that The Gadget Show had recently run a test where a G-Shock was used as an ice hockey puck an performed well. Click the Play button to watch it.


This sounded the sort of durability I was after. Previous Googling had revealed that whilst some sites listed my model for £84.99 they were not clear whether the model was actually in stock. I parted with the cash for an AWG-101-1AER and you can find the technical specification on the Casio UK web site here.

First Impressions

  • Setup was as per the instructions, which I went through even though it was set to London, The Rugby transmitter and therefore the correct time.
  • The Date shows 1.29 to show January 29th American style rather than 29.1 to show 29th January correctly.
  • The moulded rubber strap, which it looks hard to change, can be either a little loose or a little tight.
  • The time is second perfect.
  • It looks quite subtle by comparison to many watches.
  • Summary I found this video of what G-Shocks can stand up to. There are lots more on YouTube. Very pleased so far but early days yet and I have my first game of squash in it tonight – though I will be using a ball.
    Update
    After 2 years of ownership here's what I think:
    The Good
    Time always spot on
    Robust
    Still looks good (IMHO)
    The Bad
    Changing the time is not intuitive - rememebr to take the manual on holiday to say Egypt!!
    Hands obscure the left & right digital displays at times.
    You can't read the digital displays in the dark
    Overall I like it - everlasting battery free accuracy outweighs the visibility issues.